How we work

This business started because we kept running into ineffective discussions.

We saw it in public discourse, in politics, and in boardrooms.

So we started working on ways to help teams communicate better using the structures we learned in debate.

We built our approach based on our experience as world level competitive debaters and adapted it into practical tools for teams, leaders, and analysts.

Workshop session
Speaker presenting
01

Why debate

Debate gives structure to conversations that usually go nowhere.

Instead of talking in circles, teams learn how to focus on what actually matters, listen to each other, and move the discussion forward.

Because the goal of a disagreement is not to win. It’s to reach a better agreement.

Debate session

02

Our method

A simple structure for conversations that need to lead somewhere.

01

Question

A discussion begins with a clearly defined question.

02

Arguments

Participants present structured arguments for different directions.

03

Comparison

Arguments are compared and evaluated.

04

Decision

The discussion concludes with a clear direction.

The people behind it

We both come from competitive debate and got tired of how discussions actually look in real life.

Dr. Roy Shulman

Dr. Roy Shulman

WORLD DEBATING CHAMPION, 2019

PhD in moral psychology and former world debating champion.

Has spent over 15 years working with teams, public organizations, and students around complex discussions.

Jessica Gurevich

Jessica Gurevich

WORLD DEBATING FINALIST, 2025

Background in neuroscience and diplomacy, and a world debating finalist.

Works with public organizations, including women’s organizations, bringing debate into real conversations.

Workshop session with audience

Some conversations just need a better structure.

Talk on WhatsApp
Back to home